|
ACF Examples
ACF has now been qualified by five Japanese IC packaging houses for use in CSPs.
FIGURE 1 (14 kb) shows a cellular phone board utilizing an ASIC bonded with ACF to an organic substrate, which in turn makes a solder-ball based connection to the motherboard. This particular phone was introduced to the market in 1999. It and many ACF-based successors currently total several tens of millions of phones in customer hands.
ACF has also been qualified by three Japanese companies for use in MCMs.
FIGURE 2 (17 kb) is an example from a handheld digital radio. The five unpackaged ICs on the board were all attached using ACF. Many other examples can be found in PDAs. A-COB assemblies are also being used in very challenging applications, technically far more difficult than the high-volume commercial applications.
The most common type of ACF package currently being manufactured, with estimated quantities as high as 12,000,000 units per month, is the COF display driver package used in many of the most advanced handheld information display devices. These assemblies combine one or more ICs with passive components on a thin polyimide film to allow high-density interconnection to liquid crystal displays.
COB and MCM interconnections are presently limited to 0.080mm pitch (center-to-center) because of the difficulty in manufacturing fine-pitch substrates. However, COF packages regularly use 0.060mm pitches for the IC-film connection, and 0.040mm pitches are now in high volume production for a small number of designs.
FIGURE 3 (10 kb) shows a Sony HyperFlex substrate without the IC. The IC would be bonded to the center area using ACF, followed by standard solder reflow to attach the adjacent passive components.
Reliability
The last sentence in the previous paragraph often causes people unfamiliar with ACF to pause and reread it, because they assume that any solder processes must take place prior to the ACF bonding process. In fact, A-COF and A-COB packages now quite commonly pass JEDEC Level 1 certification. All of the examples given in this introduction had at least one solder reflow process performed after the ACF bond. The ability of ACF to withstand multiple solder reflows was a major milestone in its growing acceptance within the semiconductor packaging industry.
Cost
The semiconductor industry, while always investigating and using new technologies in high-end applications, relentlessly seeks lower costs for high-volume applications. ACF offers cost savings over older technologies. While cost models vary, a subset of cost drivers has emerged which show ACF as not only the most space-effective packaging method for certain applications, but also the most cost-effective method. These cost drivers are die size, redistribution layers, substrate costs, and underfill.
Die size is easily understood if one considers that pad sizes as small as 800µm2 and pad-to-pad gaps of only 15µm are now commercial realities in A-COF applications and will soon work their way into A-COB. Rather than increase the die size to allow larger peripheral pads or a larger peripheral pitch to meet wire-bonding constraints, designers using ACF can use much smaller and finer-pitch pads, reducing die size and cost.
Similarly, in current non-ACF flipchip applications, the designer may be forced to use an area array under the die to increase pad size and spacing while reducing die size and cost. However, this array requires additional redistribution layers within the die and on the substrate, negating the cost benefits of die size reduction. ACF lets the designer reduce die size while maintaining only peripheral pads that require no redistribution layer on the die, and often do not require one on the substrate, further reducing cost.
ACF also eliminates the need for solder resist under the die and between the contact pads. The solder mask required for C4 and other solder-based processes greatly reduces yields at board houses. Eliminating solder resist can significantly lower costs.
Lastly, ACF has the further advantage of requiring no underfill, even for very large die, eliminating that time-consuming and expensive step.
Conclusion
ACF is gaining wide acceptance among Asian end-users and semiconductor packaging houses. Its relatively slower acceptance in the United States and Europe may reflect Asia’s 30 years of favorable experience with ACF in displays. However, the reliability, packaging, and cost advantages of ACF cannot be long ignored. Particularly in the hypercompetitive semiconductor arena, where cost, functionality, and reliability are continually driven to new levels, ACF represents the bright future for middle and high-end manufacturing. As I/O counts become higher, more and more IC designers and users will find that fine-pitch, small-package, high-reliability ACF is their best choice.
|